Yet so incendiary was Craig's first turn in the role that he instantly cast his predecessor as one of the weaker, lazier Bonds. Prior to his arrival on the scene, Brosnan was often mentioned as the best 007 since Connery. One that many might argue was rather better for eschewing many of the tropes that people connect with the series, and one that on a critical level revived a franchise that most reviewers regarded as long past its sell-by date.Ĭasino Royale also had a new 007, Daniel Craig, a muscular and rather stern-looking chap who brought a damaged determination to the role but had less of the suave flamboyance of earlier incarnations (proving that both he and Bond didn't really need it). That's why the best Bond movie has to be one that is abstracted from the series' heyday and all its attendant cultural gravy one that was required to succeed not just as a great Bond film, but as a great film in its own right.
